Bone Graft Options
The main bone graft options used in spine fusions are:
- Bone from the patient (autograft)
This option involves removing healthy bone from the patient, typically from the
patient’s hip (pelvis), in a procedure that is done at the same time as the spinal
fusion surgery. This type of bone graft is considered optimal, as it has all of
the qualities needed to help achieve a fusion and has no risk of disease transmission
(vs. using cadaver bone). The drawback is that there is a risk of postoperative
pain in the hip area where the bone is removed, and in some cases (with recent studies,
of 100-200 patients each, indicating 25%-30% of patients), this discomfort may become
chronic (persisting 24-48 months after the surgery). 1 2 Additionally,
there can be insufficient quantity or quality of bone there for available harvesting.
- Cadaver bone (allograft)
This form of bone graft is harvested from a cadaver by a tissue bank. Using cadaver
bone eliminates the potential surgical risks associated with taking bone from the
patient. While there are many quality control steps in the process of harvesting
and processing cadaver bone, the possible risk of disease transmission cannot be
totally eliminated. While allograft bone does not have any living cells that are
required to stimulate new bone growth, and thus has a lower chance of fusion as
compared to using the patient’s bone, it has proven comparable in certain studies
to autograft in terms of producing successful fusions. 3 4 5
- DBM (demineralized bone matrix)
DBM is allograft (cadaver bone graft) that has been processed (demineralized) to
extract the natural proteins that promote bone formation. After processing, DBM
is available for use in spine fusion in a number of forms, such as powder, putty
or chips.
- Ceramic-based synthetics (also known as synthetic bone graft)
There are several synthetic substances such as Calcium Phosphates (CaP) that have
similar chemistries and structures to that of natural bone. When mixed with bone
marrow aspirate (BMA), they have biological activity that helps regenerate bone
growth within the surgical site. There are various clinical studies supporting the
clinical efficacy of this type of combination in growing bone in a spinal fusion.
Unlike allograft, these products do not present the risk of disease transmission,
and they eliminate the need to harvest autograft, and thus eliminate surgical morbidity.
- Bone Marrow Aspirate (BMA)
Bone marrow is the soft tissue inside bones that contains stem cells that help form
bone. It is found in the hollow part of most bones. Bone marrow aspiration is the
removal of a small amount of this tissue in liquid form via a minimally invasive
approach. Bone marrow aspiration can be done at several places on the body, generally
from the back of the pelvic bone or from the vertebral body during surgery, to remove
enough bone marrow cells to add to a synthetic bone graft. The principal advantage
of using this approach is that it provides cells and biological growth factors that
assist in the healing and regeneration of bone without the morbidity of autograft.
- BMP (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)
BMP’s are proteins that can be produced, concentrated and used to promote bone growth
to achieve a spine fusion. Although BMP has been shown to work well in numerous
applications, there are some unique complications that have been reported with off-label
use, i.e. cervical (neck) spine procedures. BMP is approved for use in ALIF (anterior
lumbar interbody fusion) procedures of the spine. 6 7
1 Anderson DG, et al. Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Crest Bone Harvest for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine. 2003 Jan 15;28(2):134-9.
2 Sasso RC, et al. Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb1;18 Suppl:S77-81.
3 Gibson S, McLeod I, Wardlaw D, et al. Allograft versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized control trial. Spine. 2002 Aug 1;27(15):1599-603.
4 Samartzis D, Shen FH, Goldberg EJ, et al. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine. 2005 Aug 1;20(15):1756-61.
5 Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK, et al. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. Spine. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):451-9.
6 Shahlaie K, Kim KD. Occipitocervical fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: adverse effects due to tissue swelling and seroma. Spine. 2008 Oct 1;33(21):2361-6.
7 Vaidya R, et al. Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug 1;16(8):1257-65.